MP3 Laws Unfair to Consumers
Beware of RIAA
Here is an interesting article on the king of the downloads and his opinion of the laws surrounding downloading.
This site examines what the law says.
And the following are examples of the freedoms that we as consumers should have, and examples of how the music companies are not fair. If only congress would listen to the little guy!
Under law a person is only allowed to make one copy of a song that they own. This copyright law is unfair to the consumer. If I want to make a party tape of various songs that I like and I get tired of that particular mix, I cannot legally re-copy any song. That is extreme, and the consumers are tired of the abuse in power of the record companies. Consumers should take note that the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) was involved in the hearings on digital piracy. One theory is that the MPAA is trying to prevent recording of television or movies that will be broadcasted in the HDTV format.
I disagree that parents should have to pay the penalties of music that is downloaded by their children. For any such laws to be fair, the consumer (not the MPAA) should benefit from them as well. The consumer should be able to hold the rights to any song they ever buy. If they bought a song as a record, LP, EP, or 45, they should be allowed to download the song in any format. The record companies should take the blame for faulty formats that scratch or stop playing appropriately. The music companies were less than honest when they justified raising the price of an album two dollars because they said it cost them more to make a CD than to release it in the cassette format. If that were the case, the price should have been lowered when CDs became less costly. I believe that the music companies should allow downloading of music. Instead they should release the material in attractive packaging while always guaranteeing high levels of crystal clear fidelity.
Obtain a free Ipod.